You’ve Been Pulled Over in Louisiana: What Do You Actually Have to Do?

The blue lights come on behind you.

You pull over. The officer approaches your window and begins asking questions.

“Do you know why I stopped you?”

“Where are you coming from?”

“Where are you going?”

“Step out of the vehicle.”

“Do you mind if I search your car?”

Which of those questions must you answer? Can the officer make you get out? Can you refuse a search? And what should you absolutely avoid doing during a traffic stop?

There is an important difference between complying with a lawful command and voluntarily giving up a constitutional right.

Understanding that difference can make a traffic stop safer while also protecting your rights.

First Things First: You Have to Stop

When a police officer gives a driver a lawful visual and audible signal to stop, intentionally refusing to stop can itself constitute a crime.

Louisiana Revised Statute 14:108.1 prohibits a driver from intentionally refusing to bring a vehicle to a stop when the driver knows that a police officer has given the required signal to stop and the officer has reasonable grounds to believe the driver committed an offense.

Continuing to flee under circumstances in which human life is endangered can result in the substantially more serious offense of aggravated flight from an officer.

So the first rule is simple:

Pull over.

Find a reasonably safe location, activate your turn signal, slow down, and stop the vehicle.

Do I Have to Get Out of My Car?

If the officer lawfully orders you out of the vehicle during a lawful traffic stop, generally, yes.

This surprises many people.

The United States Supreme Court addressed the issue in Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977).

The Court held that once a vehicle has been lawfully detained for a traffic violation, an officer may order the driver to get out of the vehicle without violating the Fourth Amendment.

Louisiana has followed that principle.

In State v. Landry, 588 So. 2d 345 (La. 1991), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the safety concerns associated with traffic stops and recognized an officer’s authority, under the circumstances presented, to order occupants from a stopped vehicle.

Louisiana appellate courts have repeatedly recognized that once an officer has lawfully stopped a vehicle for a traffic violation, the officer may order the driver out while the stop is being completed.

Therefore, if an officer says:

“Step out of the vehicle.”

The roadside is generally not the place to litigate whether the officer has a sufficient reason for giving that instruction.

Comply peacefully.

If the stop or command was unlawful, that issue can be challenged later through the judicial process.

What About Passengers?

Passengers should not assume they are completely outside the officer’s authority simply because they were not driving.

In Landry, the Louisiana Supreme Court specifically considered a passenger who was ordered out during a traffic stop. The Court concluded that officer-safety considerations justified ordering the passenger out under the circumstances before it.

The United States Supreme Court subsequently held in Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997), that during a lawful traffic stop an officer may order passengers out of the vehicle pending completion of the stop.

The practical lesson is important:

Do not physically refuse an officer’s instruction to exit simply because you are the passenger.

Whether the officer could lawfully detain, identify, frisk, search, or arrest a passenger can present separate legal questions.

Getting out of the vehicle does not automatically authorize all of those additional intrusions.

What Documents Does the Driver Have to Provide?

Louisiana law requires a driver to have a driver’s license in his or her immediate possession while operating a motor vehicle and to display it upon demand by an authorized police officer.

La. R.S. 32:411.1 specifically imposes that requirement.

Louisiana law also requires compulsory motor vehicle liability security. Officers generally use electronic means to verify insurance during a stop. If electronic verification is unsuccessful, Louisiana law provides for the owner or operator to furnish evidence of insurance.

Providing legally required documentation is different from consenting to a search or answering questions unrelated to the traffic violation.

“Do You Know Why I Pulled You Over?”

This is where the conversation becomes more interesting.

An officer may ask questions during a traffic stop.

That does not necessarily mean the driver is required to answer every question.

There is a significant difference between providing required identifying or driving information and answering investigative questions.

Consider this exchange:

“Do you know how fast you were going?”

“Have you had anything to drink tonight?”

“Where are you coming from?”

“Where are you going?”

“Is there anything illegal in the car?”

Those questions can have investigative significance.

A driver should not lie to the police.

But a person also should not assume that every question asked by an officer requires a substantive answer merely because the officer asked it.

A polite response such as:

“Officer, I prefer not to answer questions.”

is very different from arguing, threatening, fleeing, or physically resisting.

Do I Have to Let the Officer Search My Vehicle?

This may be the most important distinction in the entire article.

An officer asking for permission to search is not the same thing as an officer having legal authority to search.

If an officer asks:

“Do you mind if I look inside?”

“Can I search your vehicle?”

“Would you consent to a search?”

The officer is requesting consent.

A person can decline a request for consent.

A clear response can be as simple as:

“I do not consent to any searches.”

That does not necessarily mean the officer cannot search.

Police may have another lawful basis for a search, depending upon the circumstances. Probable cause, a valid warrant, an arrest and applicable search doctrine, or another recognized exception to the warrant requirement can materially change the analysis.

But there is an enormous legal difference between police conducting a search over your objection based upon asserted legal authority and you voluntarily consenting to the search.

If you do not want to consent, say so clearly.

Then do not physically interfere.

If the officer searches anyway, the legality of that search can be challenged later.

“But I Have Nothing to Hide”

That phrase causes people unnecessary problems.

Constitutional rights are not reserved for guilty people.

Declining to consent to a search is not an admission that contraband is present. It is simply declining to voluntarily waive a constitutional protection.

Similarly, exercising the right not to answer investigative questions does not determine whether someone committed a crime.

There is generally little benefit to debating an officer on the side of the highway about constitutional law.

State your position calmly and clearly.

Then let the courts resolve any genuine constitutional dispute.

Can Police Keep Me There as Long as They Want?

No.

A lawful traffic stop is still a seizure under the Fourth Amendment.

The United States Supreme Court addressed the duration of traffic stops in Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015).

The ordinary mission of a traffic stop includes addressing the traffic violation and performing related tasks such as checking the driver’s license, checking for outstanding warrants, and reviewing registration and proof of insurance.

But the authority to detain someone based solely upon the traffic violation does not last indefinitely.

In Rodriguez, the Supreme Court held that, absent independent reasonable suspicion, police cannot extend an otherwise completed traffic stop simply to conduct a dog sniff.

The important question is whether an unrelated investigation adds time to the stop.

Of course, if additional facts develop during the traffic stop that provide reasonable suspicion or probable cause of another offense, the analysis can change.

Can I Ask Whether I’m Free to Leave?

Yes.

This can be a useful question when it becomes unclear whether the traffic stop has concluded:

“Officer, am I free to leave?”

If the answer is yes, leave calmly.

If the answer is no, do not drive away.

You can then ask:

“Am I being detained?”

Again, this is not an invitation to debate the officer.

The purpose is to clarify the nature of the encounter.

What Should I Do With My Hands?

This moves from legal requirements into practical advice.

Traffic stops involve uncertainty for both the motorist and the officer.

I recommend keeping your hands visible, generally on the steering wheel, when the officer approaches.

If your driver’s license is inside your wallet, tell the officer before reaching for it.

For example:

“My license is in my wallet. May I reach for it?”

If your registration is inside the glove compartment:

“My registration is in the glove compartment. I’m going to reach for it.”

Sudden movements toward a console, glove compartment, floorboard, bag, or waistband can unnecessarily escalate an otherwise routine encounter.

What If There Is a Gun in the Vehicle?

Louisiana motorists should be especially careful here.

The legality of possessing a firearm and the wisdom of making sudden movements around a firearm during a police encounter are two entirely different questions.

Do not reach toward a firearm.

Do not suddenly attempt to retrieve or display it.

Follow lawful commands and keep your movements deliberate.

The precise legal obligations concerning firearms can depend upon the person’s status, location, manner of possession, and circumstances of the encounter. That issue deserves its own Legal Corner article.

Should I Argue That the Stop Is Illegal?

Generally, no.

You may be completely correct that the officer stopped the wrong vehicle.

You may believe you were not speeding.

You may believe there was no probable cause for a search.

You may even ultimately prevail on a motion to suppress.

None of those issues need to be won on the side of the highway.

The courtroom provides procedures for challenging unlawful stops, unlawful detention, unlawful searches, and illegally obtained evidence.

The roadside does not.

What Should You NOT Do During a Traffic Stop?

There are several things I strongly recommend avoiding.

Do not flee.

A traffic citation can turn into a criminal prosecution very quickly when someone decides to drive away.

Do not physically resist.

Louisiana Revised Statute 14:108 criminalizes certain forms of resisting or obstructing an officer engaged in a lawful arrest or detention. Louisiana also separately criminalizes resisting a police officer with force or violence.

Do not make sudden movements.

Tell the officer where you are reaching before retrieving documents.

Do not lie.

Silence and deception are not the same thing. If you do not want to answer an investigative question, politely decline rather than inventing an answer.

Do not argue your entire case on the roadside.

You are unlikely to conduct a successful suppression hearing through the driver’s-side window.

Do not voluntarily consent to something you do not actually want to permit.

If you do not consent to a search, say that clearly and respectfully.

Do not physically prevent a search.

If an officer announces that a search will occur despite your refusal, repeat that you do not consent and do not interfere physically.

Do not assume being cooperative requires surrendering every constitutional right.

You can be respectful, calm, and compliant with lawful commands while still declining consent and declining to answer investigative questions.

The Difference Between Compliance and Consent

Perhaps the easiest way to remember your rights during a Louisiana traffic stop is to separate commands from requests.

If an officer lawfully orders:

“Step out of the vehicle.”

Comply.

If the officer says:

“Give me your driver’s license.”

Provide the documentation Louisiana law requires.

But if the officer asks:

“Can I search your car?”

That is a very different legal question.

You may respond:

“I do not consent to a search.”

And if questioning moves beyond the basic traffic matter, you can respectfully decline to answer investigative questions.

Knowing your rights does not require being confrontational.

A Traffic Stop Is Not the Place to Win the Case

Perhaps the most important advice is this:

Your objective during a traffic stop should be to get through the encounter safely, preserve your rights, and avoid creating additional legal problems.

If an officer is wrong, there are mechanisms for addressing that later.

A lawyer can examine whether there was a lawful basis for the initial stop, whether the detention lasted too long, whether reasonable suspicion developed, whether consent was actually voluntary, whether a search was lawful, and whether evidence should be suppressed.

Those questions are decided using evidence, body-camera footage, reports, testimony, statutes, and constitutional law.

They are not decided by whoever argues the loudest on the side of the highway.

Be respectful.

Follow lawful commands.

Provide the documentation the law requires.

Do not flee.

Do not physically resist.

Do not lie.

Do not voluntarily consent to a search if you do not wish to consent.

And remember that cooperating with an officer does not require voluntarily surrendering every constitutional right you possess.

Sources

Louisiana Revised Statute 14:108, Resisting an Officer.

Louisiana Revised Statute 14:108.1, Flight from an Officer; Aggravated Flight from an Officer.

Louisiana Revised Statute 14:108.2, Resisting a Police Officer with Force or Violence.

Louisiana Revised Statute 32:56, Obedience to Police Officers and Traffic Signs.

Louisiana Revised Statute 32:411.1, Licensee to Have License in Immediate Possession.

Louisiana Revised Statutes 32:863.1 and 32:863.1.1, Evidence and Verification of Compulsory Motor Vehicle Liability Security.

Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 220, Submission to Arrest; Use of Force.

Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977).

Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997).

Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015).

State v. Landry, 588 So. 2d 345 (La. 1991).

State v. Broussard, 2000-3230 (La. 5/24/02), 816 So. 2d 1284.

State v. Kinard, 12-446 (La. App. 5 Cir. 11/27/12).

Legal Disclaimer

This article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Traffic stops are highly fact-specific. The legality of a stop, detention, search, frisk, arrest, or command can depend upon facts not addressed here. Anyone facing a criminal charge or constitutional issue arising from a traffic stop should consult a Louisiana attorney regarding the specific circumstances.

Sparks Law Group
We are dedicated to our clients.